Follow the Eye Before See Rule Brochure

*The Optometric Society released its newest brochure, “Eye Before See” at SECO 2015. The “Eye Before See” Initiative is a public awareness campaign emphasizing the importance of having an eye health examination, and not just refraction alone. The brochure highlights and educates the public that just because someone has 20/20 vision, it does not mean that they have a healthy eye. Copies of the brochure are available for purchase upon request, and can be distributed when speaking in your local communities, public service organizations, schools or have available in your office for your patients. You can view the brochure by clicking here.

The public often believes that refraction alone is an eye exam. This brochure and the Eye Before See Initiative is an easy way to educate the public on the importance of having a comprehensive eye exam to make certain their eyes are healthy for good sight now and into the future.

 “Eye Before See: A healthy eye is needed to have and maintain good sight”.  

If interested in prints or working on more ways to get the “Eye Before See” message out pleasecontact TOS President, Dr. Bryan Wolynski at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

California Medical Board Responds to TOS

The Medical Board of California responds to the TOS letter regarding Opternative:

Central Complaint Unit

November 26, 2014

The Optometric Society
P.O. Box 8288
La Jolla, CA 92038
Re: Opternative

Dear Board of Directors:

The Medical Board of California (Board) is in receipt of your recent correspondence regarding Opternative. In this letter you expressed your concerns about the possibility patients may not be receiving treatment within the accepted standard of care if ophthalmologists use this technology.

The Board welcomes any information you may have which indicates one of our licensees may be providing treatment to a patient which is not

When Insurance and Pharmacies Compromise Patient Care

generic drug

by Gary S. Litman, OD, FAAO

I practice full scope optometry with an emphasis on medical eye care. Since the beginning of 2014 and increasingly getting worse, I have experienced a growing number of denials for branded prescriptions. This has compromised my ability to treat patients with the most effective medications. I have been waiting for organized optometry to address this issue, but so far I have not observed any discussion.

I stay up-to-date on the newest and most effective treatments via medications and technology. On every front, we are seeing a push for optometrists to become more medically oriented. My concern is that insurers and pharmacies are preventing me from prescribing these new, more effective medications.

In recent months, in every category of ophthalmic drugs I E-Prescribe, I receive a significant number of denied branded drugs with a recommendation for generics or OTC drugs. I have observed on occasion, pharmacies substituting generics for branded drugs without my consent. I have observed patients who have the same insurance for the previous two years and have been taking specific branded drugs effectively get denials and a request for prior authorization. Most of these drug denials are

Weigh the Benefits and Costs before Joining any Maintenance of Certification Program

By Dr. Janet Carter

With the introduction of a program of optometric board certification by the National Board of Examiners in Optometry late last year, there are now several viable choices for those who wish to pursue certification in general optometry. But before making a decision to apply for a program, the practitioner must first determine if formal board certification is something they wish to accomplish. Board Certification in general optometry is entirely voluntary. There are currently no third-party payers that require certification of their optometric providers, no requirement for such to participate in plans offered through the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"), and no indication that Medicare will require board certification of optometrists in the foreseeable future. It is true that employers, hospitals, and the like may use certification as part of their determination of admitting privileges and/or salary. Perhaps more importantly, participation in the "Maintenance of Certification" (MOC) aspect of board certification represents an ongoing commitment by the practitioner to lifelong learning and to keep up with technological and scientific developments in the profession.

The practitioner must also distinguish between programs that certify optometrists in general clinical optometry and sub-specialty certification. In Medicine, the board certification system came into existence because physicians graduate with a degree that gives them broad eligibility to practice a wide variety of specialties, regardless of their actual training. The MD board certification helps to insure that they have had sufficient training and education in their chosen specialty area. Optometrists, on the other hand,